The gods of the market do not support any other form of religiosity, they will accuse of what we used to call “humanism” of “pobrism”. They demonstrate every conception of man's thinking that transcends consumption. They are two religions that face each other, consumerism and humanism. Taxes and labor laws are the sins of the time and the word “patriarchy” paradoxically from the error of the idea of gender would explain a definition of human history.
There were always believers and atheists, it was not usual for them to respect each other, of course, if you fall in love with the market it is very difficult for you to accept the existence of another paradise. Christ drove the merchants out of the temple, a long time ago that conflict existed. We can imagine that God or life, as we like, gave us a Holy Father born in our lands, his presence imposed the challenge of the encounter, one more instance and the transcendent ones, to become a homeland united in the pride of his presence. Quite the contrary, his appearance acted as an exorcist who threatens to expel demons from the body of insane people. Freemasonry and banks in harmonious response came out to give their opinion with a village and local view, defining their pastoral work in the world according to the ideas of the parishioners with a familiar face who visited their humility.
The association of the rich without sin explained that their humble origin contained the danger of a paradise outside private neighborhoods. “Pobrismo” accused the collusion of new rich, “patriarchy” denounced fashion genres. Both radicals and Peronists endure a split in their ranks produced by the rich who become from the party of the elegant ones. And not only rich people, too many poor people who are passionate about keeping what is alien, feeling of a higher class even if they have nowhere to fall dead, our grandmothers would say.
“Stockholm Syndrome” is called that of falling in love with the executioner. As in opposition to the agreement with the Fund, the left-wing and right-wing principals knew how to agree on the denunciation. They are right, but it is barren to proclaim it, politics is not a path to heroism, sometimes it needs to negotiate, wait or retreat. We live with an economist and retrograde right and with a left that is more supposed than real. Our left occupies the State more to accommodate relatives than to face monopolies. And the right wing suffered a psychological decline when it lost the Chilean example. How often do we endure speeches that praised Chile and its market economy, it is now clear where such virtues lead.
They tried to support the Bolivian right wing, without the slightest achievement, even though the debatable character of Evo Morales came out in irrational defense of Putin. And in Brazil they express two national versions, the current right-wing one that was not successful and the previous one, by Lula, which was infinitely superior to all our experiences. Chile bares the agony of market liberalism and our right wing dreams of ideological votes without taking into account that as long as poor people continue to multiply, their voters will shrink.
The surveys in our reality are not sold, they are rented and have been missing you for a long time. If the government fails like the left it intends to be, it will come the turn of the opposition, in one of its two versions of the permanent right, now with the help of some who want to contribute “the Peronist leg” or that of the reborn radicalism. Those of us who know history know very well that the Conservatives always got along better with the Peronists than with the radicals. A difficult but successful moment for every intention of sanity, those who voted against the agreement are still part of the will to break out but suffered a harsh defeat, lost with the eternal hopelessness of the pessimists.
The fracture of the government makes its continuity dream difficult and in the opposition the dream of continuing a meek radicalism ready to support the PRO continues to be complicated. The previous experience was disastrous, he went into debt to win and lost worse, it leaves the feeling that the project failed, not just the candidates. Aside from being honest, anyone who wins isn't going to fix anything we need to prosecute. It seems that the struggle for state power has nothing to do with the need for a national project. Government errors abound while only stripping the ambitions of the opposition. Like those who continue to defend the nefarious murderer Vladimir Putin from so anti-America. Some deserved respect for me until this juncture where it became clear that one can be anti-United States but never again pro-Russian. It is true that one thinks from the West that China appears as the power of the future, as well as that being employed by competing interests, whether of banks or Russians, is a manifest form of betrayal of the homeland.
Without patriotism or awareness of our foreign policy, we will continue to wait for a project that contains all of us inhabitants, that and nothing else is the obligation of politics. The rest only express private interests, a path that always leads to new failures. There should not be many examples in the history of a society where the part imposes itself on the whole, in our case, the economy over politics, business and negotiated to collective destiny. Difficult to understand, most accusing speeches in the face of an incomprehensible absence of projects to convene. For now, without politics, we'll see how it goes. The crisis of the government served to bring together the dialogue sectors of the opposition. Sanity prevailed, the tough ones were defeated, the maturity of the agreements appears, it is the best possible scenario.
KEEP READING: