Its name became famous for the Coppola case, a judicial media scandal that arrested Diego Maradona's manager in 1996 and opened the door to a new television genre. On the channel set witnesses, lawyers anddefendants marched in sensational games that broke the rating. These programs did not keep the form of the court, and the so-called Coppola girls (that's how they are known) came to live and live their hair.
However, it has been more than 25 years since then, and Natalia Denegri changed her life. After the bubble that caused the incident, he was unable to get a job because her figure was hopelessly linked to the fame she starred in. However, in 2002, her life “clicked”.
It was when Alto Palermo began to help a woman suffering from cancer alone who was begging for charity. I wanted to do “something positive.” He accompanied her to the end. He participated in an association that promotes the cause of solidarity and made a film about autism that won an international award. This is how it appeared on television in Miami, and more projects came out. Currently, she is a journalist in the city where she lives with her family, and she does not want what made her famous in Argentina to be seen as an Internet search related to her name.
Natalia De Negri says to Infobae: “I want you to understand it well. “I was a victim. I didn't choose anything at the time. He was a minor. They planted drugs on me and arrested me. They took me to Dolores and took me to the press when I came out. I felt completely familiar... I already won a trial against the Argentine state, and I was imprisoned by a group of judges and police officers who were all convicted.”
“Today I live in the United States, committed to journalism and solidarity, won international awards... and today when someone puts my name in a search engine, the past all comes first... I will give you everything you should never live again. It's martyrdom.” He says.
Natalia has two young children, the boy is two and a half years old, but the 7-year-old girl is already starting Google and asked if she was the one who appeared there. The same is true of the mothers of her school friends. That is why she filed this lawsuit that Google appealed, although it was already supported in the first and second cases in a presentation supporting the Attorney General and the Association that groups journalistic organizations due to the impact that this criterion could do. There are other cases.
Natalia, implying a pilgrimage through a program that did a show in the Coppola case, argues that “such an event would threaten freedom of expression, since it does not convey information.” “I want to stop getting my name on the note that it is only about re-generating sexual violence and digital violence, the content of which continues to hurt me and try to feed people who are morbid,” and he strengthened: “I don't ask you to delete anything or stop posting, but when I search for me on Google and YouTube, I don't associate my name with a fight video in the formula.”
Keep reading:
It's not oblivion. Yes for the transparency of the algorithm.