“Foolishness”: Jean-Claude Besudo did not like what his grandson did as a voting jury

The president of the air tourism company, Colombian-France Jean Claude Bessudo, was not at all sympathetic to not liking what his grandson Suani Lefevre Bessudo did. He said he intervened in the voting and voting certificate of the table where he was jurors. He announced this in an interview with the newspaper El Tiempo.

Bessudo says he is far from social networks and gets information through physical media such as newspapers and magazines. He says he has rarely subscribed to the newly opened digital magazine Cambio.

Then he learned what had happened to Suani Lefevre Bessudo through the transcripts he made in the media he consumed.He calls his statements “absolutely unacceptable”, “stupid” and does not correspond to the training received by his grandson. Especially because of the derogatory attitude of referring to people with political preferences, not their own.

He is somewhat suspicious of what his grandson actually did at the polling station. This is because each position has at least three people signing as voting jury.However, he assured that “the most important thing is that the prosecutor's office investigates it and that the law in question applies to the complete rigor of the case.”

Bessudo reacted harshly when a journalist told her that her grandson, a student at the Universidad de los Andes, had recorded another video in which she tried to withdraw and satirize what she said. “If so, let's say it's very bad.

Jean Claude Bessudo stressed that he was not responsible for the personal actions of his relatives, but he was convinced that Suani Lefevre Bessudo's actions were “the most disparate to the education he received at home” and what he learned at the French academy.I remember having learned the value of transparency after high school.

From what she called “all Petrists hijuput,” Suani Lefevre Bessudo told her Instagram story how she would have committed fraud in the election on March 13, and asked to elect a candidate for Congress and President in a consultation between the parties.

The young man was convinced that sometimes citizens failed to deliver an election certificate, a document certifying their participation in elections and receiving benefits such as a half-day off and public contest preferences.

If voters insisted on receiving the document, they said they revoked the certificate by incorrectly entering their name or identification number.

He also pointed out that those who voted for the card were handed one of the consultations of the Union of Centro Esperanza, in which Gustavo Petro, Francia Marquez, Arelis Uriana, Camilo Romero and Alfredo Saade participated. According to him, “Many people didn't even know who they were voting for, and they didn't even know who they were voting for. It's amazing.”

According to criminal lawyer Carlos Gómez, in an interview with El Tiempo, Suani Lefevre Bessudo would have committed ideological falsehoods in public documents by changing the data in the certificate and would have committed more lies due to concealment by not passing public documents.

In addition, Gómez, who changed the card explicitly requested by voters, believes that Lefevre may have committed fraud against suffragists.

Lefevre Bessudo has uploaded two reels to his Instagram account to withdraw what has already been said, but an investigation will be carried out to see what happened at table 1 of Altos de San Isidro, in the town of Usaquén, where he actually voted as a jury.

Keep reading: