President Pedro Castillo made a message to the Congress of the Republic. Urusi 13 days after he appeared There to answer the vacancy. He For content analysis, Infobaeinterviewed political scientist Jose Alejandro Godoya. He noted that the fundamental problem of the President's speech is that there is no goal at all
For Professor Cattolica del Peru, President Castillo's request for the national agreement, at the University Pontisia, Peru, the conversation with the opposition party will be of great relevance against the background of a polarized point between the two branches of the country.
-Was it a non-aggression report?
- Yes, if I want to explain, whether there is an intention of the message to enter the peculiar contract on non-aggression. I think the President knows that there is currently not enough votes for Congress to clear it. on the other hand, the government basically does not have a legal tool to join the elections. Because there are no voices.
—There were hearings about the project which directed elections, after all the president didn't do it. What would happen if President Castillo dared to announce this?
- Perhaps at that time he [Castillo] did not succeed in this situation, this initiative would not have to implement voting.It is clear that the House of Representatives has a key point that relies on the presidential baton, that is, the President must leave, but the parliament of the republic should not go.
-It seems that the message was delivered to the public to get out of corruption scandal a little, a description of everything that he did, and that he subsequently meant.
- With the same rhetoric of the message on July 28 it usually ends with laundering everything that each sector does, and doesn't focus on questions to be answered. There is no clear strategy and there is only one non-aggression treaty. In addition, the president basically spends a few minutes to finally find what to do.The problem is that there are no clear initiatives, no big announcements, big achievements to show. for example, you may find that you have no plans for what you are want to find with this post.
-Conciliatory notice and what it will do; This will already be verified by figures and analyses of experts.
- Yes, but moreover, if to look strictly in communication, the problem here is that the President of the Republic doesn't choose one or two subjects which should be studied, and that he does is the list. Now, let's say, everything disappears over time.
-Like a message with a community.
- There seems to be some kind of strategy. If you investigated the details, you probably transferred the ammunition of the opposition.
-The President also mentioned the complaint to be answered by Congress 28: Have you made the necessary clarifications about the case of Karelim Lopez or about going to the sea to Bolivia?
- I think that the main problem of the presented complaint is not sufficiently explained, and I don't know whether messages to the country are the best space to explain such complaints very clear.On the other hand, so far we saw that there are no grounds for achieving vacancy through moral incompetence in dissatisfaction.
-But it was a preview of what it had to say.
- It may seem, but meanwhile I don't know, perhaps, the president can make the decision to entrust the lawyer in parliament for legal protection.
-What was the omission?
- The fundamental problem with the message is that there is no goal at all. cete that has been done more than skipping this topic or something to declare. Rather, I believe it reflects a situation in which they do not have a simple and simple clarity about what to do. On the other hand, let's say they have no purpose to change the course they have taken. It is a feeling that the message leaves.
-The President also proposed to announce the reform and urged to convene a national agreement in the final part, how could this be feasible at the moment?
- Proposals connected with national agreements, are a problem, say, they usually occur, they aren't necessarily new. The usual and simple thing is that when there is no more dialogue, the national agreement relies on it. It's a space for counseling, but he became a tailor when the president recently got into trouble.
-You believe that national agreements will not have much power to reduce political tensions.
- The question consists in the purpose of the state agreement.
-The President also took advantage of his message to list a number of measures taken by Congress: How should opposition parties accept these critical remarks?
- In that part, the president is more or less correct. There is no doubt that there is a parliamentary unit in promoting President Castillo's vacancy. Of course, so far, they target three benches: Fuerza Popular, Avanza Pais and Popular Renewal, which will not change their attitude towards the president.
Continue reading: