Basketball Arbitral Tribunal publishes BAT COVID-19 Guidelines

MIES (Switzerland) – The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal, the independent body officially recognized by FIBA, which provides resolution services for disputes between players, agents, coaches and clubs through arbitration, has published a set of BAT COVID-19 Guidelines.

Given the extraordinary situation caused by the current COVID-19 pandemic and in order to provide greater legal certainty to the basketball community, the Guidelines have been issued by the BAT President Prof. Dr. Ulrich Haas, the BAT Vice-President Raj Parker, and all BAT Arbitrators. They are intended to provide actual and potential BAT users with guidance in proceedings and help facilitate amicable settlements within the basketball community.

As an independent arbitration tribunal that has adjudicated more than 1500 basketball cases over the last decade, the BAT will decide in case of financial disputes arising from contracts which include a BAT clause. FIBA is not a party to these contracts or disputes and its role is limited to ensuring that the BAT awards, once issued, are honored by the parties.

FIBA wishes to encourage all players, coaches, agents and clubs to acknowledge the unique circumstances that we are all going through now and reach agreements with mutual concessions to the extent possible. It is important, especially in this period, to exhaust the possibility of an amicable settlement of a dispute prior to seeking recourse to the BAT or any other courts.

FIBA

COVID-19 Guidelines

Issued on 20 April 2020 by the

BAT President, Vice-President and Arbitrators

The world currently finds itself in an extraordinarily difficult situation due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the

measures taken by governments to palliate its effects and the consequences of both on businesses and

employees in all sectors of activity.

Inevitably, professional basketball has been significantly affected by the crisis, especially in that most

competitions have been suspended or even terminated early. This, in turn, raises legal issues regarding

contracts in professional basketball, in particular in employment relationships of players and coaches

with clubs. Many parties to contracts in basketball have approached BAT, or FIBA, in the past weeks to

inquire how such legal issues would be handled by BAT Arbitrators.

Of course, each case has to and will be judged on its merits by the respective BAT Arbitrator, taking into

account all relevant circumstances and deciding ex aequo et bono unless otherwise agreed by the

parties (Article 15 of the BAT Arbitration Rules). However, the BAT President, Vice-President and

Arbitrators have decided that the truly exceptional situation created by the COVID-19 pandemic calls for

an exceptional step on their part, with a view to providing the basketball community with greater legal

certainty, thereby also facilitating amicable settlements.

For this purpose, the BAT President, Vice-President and Arbitrators, having collectively discussed

pursuant to Article 16.1 of the BAT Arbitration Rules1 certain substantive issues that arise as a result of

the COVID-19 pandemic, set out in these Guidelines their shared views on what they would perceive to

be just and fair solutions, under the ex aequo et bono standard, to those substantive issues.

For the avoidance of any misunderstanding, five caveats must be made:

- First, these Guidelines are of a temporary nature only, aiming to address the consequences of

the COVID-19 crisis on contracts in basketball, in particular those consequences arising out of

domestic championships being suspended or terminated early as a result of the pandemic.

1

"In the interest of the development of consistent BAT case law, the BAT President may consult with other BAT

arbitrators, or permit BAT arbitrators to consult amongst themselves, on issues of principle raised by a pending

case."

- Second, these Guidelines incorporate principles only, to which there may be exceptions

depending on the circumstances of the individual case (including, e.g., applicable public health

guidelines).

- Third, these Guidelines merely reflect a consensus reached by the BAT President, VicePresident and Arbitrators in their informal discussions on abstract legal issues. They are not

binding rules of mandatory application and, as a matter of course, they do not affect each

BAT Arbitrator’s liberty of decision in deciding an individual BAT case.

- Fourth, these Guidelines do not amend or substitute for the BAT Arbitration Rules or other rules

of procedure governing international arbitrations.

- Fifth, these Guidelines will be constantly reviewed and may be subject to adjustments

depending on relevant developments.

That being said, the principles agreed on by the BAT President, Vice-President and Arbitrators are as

follows:

I. Definition

1. In these Guidelines, the term "Lockdown Period" refers to the period starting on the date of

suspension/termination of the relevant 2019/20 domestic championship and ending on the date

on which the championship is resumed, or the original end date if it is not resumed.

II. Priority of Amicable Settlements

2. Amicable settlements are the preferred means of resolving disputes arising out of the COVID-19

crisis. Parties are under a duty to renegotiate in good faith the terms of their contract in order to

resolve on an amicable basis contractual issues arising from the pandemic.

3. Any breach of this duty may be taken into account by the arbitrator when deciding the merits of

the case and when deciding on arbitration costs, legal fees and other expenses.

4. Absent any general grounds for invalidity, amicable settlements entered into with a view to

addressing the consequences of the COVID-19 crisis will be respected by the arbitrator. This is

irrespective of whether the contents of the settlement are consistent with the further principles

set out below.

5. Amicable Settlements entered into after the beginning of the Lockdown Period will be rebuttably

presumed to have been executed by the parties with a view to addressing the consequences of

the COVID-19 crisis.

III. New Contracts entered into after the beginning of the Lockdown Period

6. The principles enshrined in these Guidelines do not apply, in principle, to contracts entered into

after the beginning of the Lockdown Period. These contracts will be rebuttably presumed to

have taken into account the effects of the COVID-19 crisis. The same applies, in principle, to

contracts that have been extended either by agreement of the parties or unilaterally by the club

after the beginning of the Lockdown Period.

IV. Allocation of risk

7. Clauses simply providing for a "fully guaranteed" or "no-cut" contract do not allocate economic

risks associated with the COVID-19 crisis to any of the parties to the contract.

8. The consequences of the COVID-19 crisis cannot be allocated to one of the parties only, absent

any clear contractual language stipulating otherwise for events sufficiently similar to the current

pandemic and its consequences on basketball competitions. Without such clear language in the

contract, the adverse consequences of the COVID-19 crisis shall be shared by both parties

according to their respective circumstances. Conversely, where the contract contains clear

language on how to allocate risks such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the arbitrator will only depart

from such agreement, in accordance with established BAT jurisprudence, if the effects of such

risk allocation would be grossly inequitable.

V. Termination and term of contracts

9. The principle of pacta sunt servanda shall be generally upheld in a manner consistent with the

standing jurisprudence of the BAT in times of the COVID-19 crisis. Consequently, a contract is

not automatically terminated because of the pandemic. Neither does the COVID-19 crisis give

either party just cause to unilaterally terminate the contract.

10. If the contract has been terminated by either party before the Lockdown Period, it will be

rebuttably presumed that the contract was not terminated because of the COVID-19 crisis. In

such case, the standing jurisprudence of BAT related to lawful/unlawful termination will apply.

11. When calculating damages for any unlawful termination not related to the COVID-19 crisis, the

arbitrators will, in principle, not take into account the hypothetical impact that the COVID-19

crisis would potentially have had on the contract had it run its normal course. In particular, in

case of any unlawful termination by a club that is unrelated to the COVID-19 crisis, the

Guidelines on reductions of players’ and coaches’ salaries (no. 16 below) shall, in principle, not

apply to the calculation of damages or outstanding remunerations under the contract. The onus

of proof that the Guidelines exceptionally apply for reasons of equity shall be on the respective

club. Elements that may be taken into account in this context are, in particular, the nature, the

motive and the gravity of the contractual breach committed, the vicinity of the breach to the

Lockdown Period and the behavior of the parties subsequent to the breach. In case there are

reasons to deviate from the above principle, i.e. non-application of the Guidelines, preference

should be given to deferring the maturity of some of the claims to the beginning of the 2020/21

season.

12. If a domestic championship extends its 2019/20 season beyond the original end date to

compensate (at least partially) for the Lockdown Period, the contracts between its participating

clubs and their players and coaches will remain in force until the date of the last match of the

respective club for that season, unless it is clear from the contract that the parties had intended

for the contract to expire before the end of the (original) 2019/2020 season, or unless it would

otherwise be grossly inequitable.

13. If, before the Lockdown Period, a player or coach has entered into a contract for the 2020/21

season with another team and the extended term (no. 12 above) of his or her contract for the

2019/20 season results in both contracts overlapping in time, the player/coach, the old club and

the new club shall seek in good faith to solve the problem by amicable settlement, taking account

of the interests involved in a proportionate and equitable manner.

VI. Effects on the contractual obligations of clubs

During the Lockdown Period, a club’s contractual obligations towards its coaches/players shall be

adapted as follows:

14. Amenities (such as car, housing, meals, health insurance): The Club shall continue to provide

any amenities as provided for under the contract, provided that the player is making use of them

in good faith, is dependent on them and to the extent they are proportionate.

15. Bonuses: Bonuses that fell due before the Lockdown Period continue to be owed, but their

maturity shall be deferred to the beginning of the 2020/21 season in the relevant domestic

championship. No bonuses shall accrue during the Lockdown Period. No bonuses shall accrue

based on the placement of the club in its domestic and international championships for the

2019/20 season unless the relevant championship is completed after the Lockdown Period.

16. Salaries: The obligation of clubs to pay salaries to players and coaches must be adapted to take

into account that

- during the Lockdown Period, the players’ and coaches’ obligation to provide

services is largely suspended (see no. 18, 19 below for players) and that

- the COVID-19 crisis has disrupted the financial framework and presumptions based

on which the contracts were executed between the parties.

Based on the above considerations, it is fair and just that the obligation of the club to pay salaries

during the Lockdown Period be subject to a general reduction as follows:

a) The size of the salary reduction will depend on the player’s/coach’s monthly salary, with

the following scale guiding the arbitrators’ assessment of the equitable reduction:

First EUR up to EUR 2,500/month Reduction by 0-20%

Every EUR exceeding EUR 2,500/month Reduction by 50% as a starting

point, but subject to adjustment

upwards or downwards (see

below)

When deciding the precise percentages to apply in an individual case, the arbitrator will

take into account in particular the following (non-exhaustive) criteria:

- the overall amount of the salary, keeping in mind that, in principle, lower salaries

shall be submitted to a lower reduction than higher salaries;

- the financial situation of the club as a result of the COVID-19 crisis;

- the individual circumstances of the player/coach, in particular his or her reasonable

living costs and the extent to which he or she is financially responsible also for

others;

- whether the parties have complied with their duty pursuant to no. 2 above of these

Guidelines and, more generally, have acted in good faith. A club will not have acted

in good faith if it discriminates against a player/coach compared to its other similarlysituated players/coaches; and

- the principle of proportionality and reasonableness, in particular how the club will

use any liquidity saved through the salary reduction.

b) It is the duty of the parties to substantiate and provide the necessary evidence to determine

the appropriate salary reduction in an individual case.

c) If the relevant domestic championship resumes its 2019/20 season after the Lockdown

Period, the monthly salaries due under the contract for the remainder of that season shall

be reduced adequately to account for the fact that the club’s income will usually be lower

than in a normal season despite the season being resumed. However, such reduction shall

be lower than the reduction applied during the Lockdown Period and shall not exceed 50%.

d) For the avoidance of doubt, salaries that became due before the Lockdown Period are not

subject to the above reduction. However, the maturity of up to 50% of any such outstanding

salaries may be deferred to the beginning of the 2020/21 season in the respective domestic

championship, provided that the club substantiates and proves that such deferral is

necessary to avoid insolvency.

17. Clubs are under a duty of care towards their players and coaches. In particular, clubs shall apply

for any and all financial help available in the applicable jurisdiction in order to ease any

consequences arising for its player/coaches because of COVID-19-related pay cuts. A breach

of this duty shall be taken into account when deciding on a reduction or deferral of the

player’s/coach’s claim.

VII. Effects on the contractual obligations of players

18. The obligation of players to provide sporting services shall be suspended during the Lockdown

Period, except and to the sole extent applicable public health guidelines so permit. Obligations

in respect of non-sporting services shall not be suspended except to the extent inconsistent with

applicable public health guidelines.

19. Players are under an obligation to stay fit and healthy during the Lockdown-Period (to the extent

possible under the conditions prevailing in the relevant country) and to participate in any

scheduled team activities that are permissible in the relevant jurisdiction, e.g. team meetings by

videoconferencing or, subject to applicable public health guidelines, individual or group training

sessions.

VIII. Agent Agreements

20. While these Guidelines focus on contractual relations between clubs and their players/coaches,

arbitrators will seek to draw on the principles herein also for contractual relations with other

actors, in particular agents, to the extent deemed appropriate

25 Years at #1: Your best source of news about the Olympics is www.aroundtherings.com, for subscribers only